Download or read book Peri-implantitis Surgical Treatment with Implantoplasty- Case Series written by Jou00e3o Carlos Ramos and published by . This book was released on 2017 with total page pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Title Peri-implantitis surgical treatment with implantoplasty: case series Background: Peri-implantitis (PI) has been defined has the presence of radiographic bone loss (RBL)u22653mm and/or probing depth (PD)u22656mm in conjugation with profuse bleeding on probing (BoP). Several surgical treatments have been proposed to treat peri-implantitis but the available evidence does not allow any specific recommendation. Ressective treatment with implantoplasty (IP) allows the decontamination of the infected implant surface. Some clinical studies confirm IP success up to nine years of follow-up.Aim/Hypothesis: To present a 24 months clinical results of peri-implantitis surgical treatment with implantoplasty. Material and Methods (977)Eight patients (17 implants) were diagnosed with peri-implantitis and included in this retrospective case analysis. At baseline the following clinical data were assessed: PD, BoP, suppuration (Sup)(dichotomous) and mucosal recession (MR). After full thickness mucoperiosteal flap and granulation tissue removal implant surface was polished using a sequence of round diamond rotatory burs (200.000 rpm) with the following sequence: blue (40u00b5m) and yellow (15 u00b5m) (Coltu00e8ne/Whaledent AG-Diatech, Switzerland). The final polishing was done with an Arkansas stone. Flaps were repositioned apically and sutured (5/0, Seralonu00ae, Serag-Wiessner, Germany). Sutures were remover at day 15 and controlled every 3 -3 months (1st year) and 6-6 months (2nd year). At 12 and 24 months all clinical data were reassessed. Changes between 0-12 and 12-24 months were analyzed (Wilcoxon test). Statistical analyses used SPSS v24 (SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM). Significance level of P u2264 .05.Results: There were no clinical complications during the healing period. Implantoplasty allowed the elimination of clinical parameters associated to PI. The clinical parameters at baseline, 12 and 24 months were, respectively: PD (5.16 u00b1 0.47mm/2.81 u00b1 0.36mm/2.83 u00b1 0.50mm), BoP (0.15 u00b1 0.02/0.01 u00b1 0.02/0.02 u00b1 0.01), MR (0.50 u00b1 0.66mm/1.45 u00b1 0.89mm/1.38 u00b1 0.99mm) and Sup (0.01 u00b1 0.01/0.00 u00b1 0.00/0.00 u00b1 0.00).For all clinical parameters than Sup there were statistical significant differences between baseline and 12 months (PD: p=0.012; [2.51; 3.10] / BoP: p=0.011; [0.00; 0.03] / MR: p=0.012; [0.70; 2.19] / Sup: p=0.066; [0.00; 0.00]). No statistical significant differences were found between 12 and 24 months (PD: p=0.389; [2.41; 3.24]/ BoP: p=0.498; [0.01; 0.03]/ MR: p=0.465; [0.56; 2.21]/ Sup: p=1.000; [0.00; 0.00]).None implant was lost.Conclusion and Clinical implications: The clinical signs associated to PI were eliminated by Implantoplasty allowing the pathology stabilization over a period of 24 months. However this method is associated with increased mucosal recession. Itu00b4s fundamental a strict maintenance program.Implantoplasty may be used to eliminate PI. However there are aesthetic considerations to be taken.