Governing with Judges

Governing with Judges
Author :
Publisher : Oxford University Press
Total Pages : 247
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9780198297307
ISBN-13 : 0198297300
Rating : 4/5 (300 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Governing with Judges by : Alec Stone Sweet

Download or read book Governing with Judges written by Alec Stone Sweet and published by Oxford University Press. This book was released on 2000 with total page 247 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: This text elaborates a theory of constitutional politics. It examines the pan-European movement to confer constitutional review authority on a new governmental institution. Cases show how and to what extent legislative processes have been under the influence of consititutional judges.

Governing with Judges Related Books

Governing with Judges
Language: en
Pages: 247
Authors: Alec Stone Sweet
Categories: Language Arts & Disciplines
Type: BOOK - Published: 2000 - Publisher: Oxford University Press

GET EBOOK

This text elaborates a theory of constitutional politics. It examines the pan-European movement to confer constitutional review authority on a new governmental
Governing with Judges
Language: en
Pages: 232
Authors: Alec Stone Sweet
Categories: Political Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2000 - Publisher: Oxford University Press on Demand

GET EBOOK

Governing with Judges elaborates a theory of constitutional politics, the process through which the discursive practices and techniques of constitutional adjudi
Governing with Judges
Language: en
Pages: 0
Authors:
Categories:
Type: BOOK - Published: 2000 - Publisher:

GET EBOOK

Governing with Judges
Language: en
Pages: 232
Authors: Alec Stone Sweet
Categories: Constitutional courts
Type: BOOK - Published: 2000 - Publisher:

GET EBOOK

Courts and Congress
Language: en
Pages: 186
Authors: Robert A. Katzmann
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2010-12-01 - Publisher: Brookings Institution Press

GET EBOOK

What role should the Senate play in the selection and confirmation of judges? What criteria are appropriate in evaluating nominees? What kinds of questions and